What criteria might be used to flag a client for follow-up in the module?

The criteria for flagging a client for follow-up is often based on indicators that suggest the client may be experiencing difficulties or may not be fully engaged in their treatment. Inactivity, missed appointments, or negative feedback can serve as significant warning signs that a client may need additional support, attention, or intervention. These factors indicate that the client might be struggling with their treatment plan, which necessitates proactive outreach to ensure their needs are being met.

High participation in group sessions, while generally a positive indicator of engagement, would not typically flag a client for follow-up as it reflects the opposite of disengagement. Similarly, feedback from staff members could be helpful but would need to be more specific regarding concerns to serve as a flag for follow-up. Lastly, the completion of all previous appointments usually indicates good engagement, so it would not serve as a reason to warrant additional follow-up. Thus, the identification of inactivity, missed appointments, or negative feedback is critical for ensuring that clients receive timely and appropriate care to help address any underlying issues they may be facing.